- It requires only monthly precipitation.
- It can be compared across regions with markedly different climates.
- The standardization of the SPI allows the index to determine the rarity of a current drought.
- It can be created for differing periods of 1-to-36 months.
A shortcoming of the SPI, as noted by Trenbert et al (2014):
- "the SPI are based on precipitation alone and provide a measure only for water supply. They are very useful as a measure of precipitation deficits or meteorological drought but are limited because they do not deal with the ET [evapotranspiration] side of the issue."
The SPI is obtained by fitting a gamma or a Pearson Type III distribution to monthly precipitation values. The default implementation of dim_spi_n uses a 2-parameter gamma distribution fit (dim_gamfit_n) where the shape and scale parameters are maximum liklihood estimates as described in
A Note on the Gamma Distribution Thom (1958): Monthly Weather Review, pp 117-122. specifically: eqn 22 for gamma; just above eqn 21However, there is some variation in the methods used to derive the SPI. Guttman (1998, 1999) recommends that the Pearson III distribution be used. Generally, this is likely to give essentially equivalent results to the 2-parameter gamma distribution fit. In some instances, where monthly and seasonal precipitation of zero is common, slightly better results.
Generally, monthly precipitation is not normally distributed so a transformation is performed such that the derived SPI values follow a normal distribution. The SPI is the number of standard deviations that the observed value would deviate from the long-term mean, for a normally distributed random variable. One interpretation of the resultant values is:
[+,-]2.00 and above/below: exceptionally [wet,dry] [+,-]1.60 to 1.99: extremely [wet,dry] [+,-]1.30 to 1.59: severely [wet,dry] [+,-]0.80 to 1.29: moderately [wet,dry] [+,-]0.51 to 0.79: abnormally [wet,dry] [+,-]0.50: near normalAn explanation of the SPI at different lengths and sample spatial pattterns over the USA at different run times are available.
More information can be obtained at the ClimateDataGuide.
References: McKee, T.B., N.J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration ot time scales. Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society Jan 17-23, 1993, Anaheim CA, pp. 179-186. McKee, T.B., N.J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple time scales. Ninth Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society Jan 15-20, 1995, Dallas TX, pp. 233-236. Guttman, N.B., 1998. Comparing the Palmer Drought Index and the Standardized Precipitation Index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 113-121. Guttman, N.B., 1999. Accepting the Standardized Precipitation Index: A calculation algorithm. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(2), 311-322. Trenberth et al (2014) Global warming and changes in drought Nature Climate Change 4, 17-22; doi:10.1038/nclimate2067